Blog

How AI Is Changing The Future of Healthcare

How-AI-Is-Changing-The -Future-of-Healthcare
Technology

How AI Is Changing The Future of Healthcare

Throughout our visions of the future and various classic science-fiction media, we often find
particular attention to detail paid towards health and medicine, and with that ideals for
well-being enabled by cutting-edge and all-encompassing technology. Be it Luke
Skywalker’s Bacta Tank session, Starfleet’s medical tricorder, or Discovery One’s habitation
ring system. Whilst these certainly appear to give their worlds some flair, the healing times of
various practices are usually only as short as the scene’s plot conversation. Nevertheless, all
explicitly sci-fi settings will eventually make a passing note on high-end healthcare or, most
especially, unprecedented lifespans.

Of course, it’s no coincidence any vision of the future entails greatly developed healthcare.
Even when looking to the past, through squabbles on the good old days or on what has
genuinely improved today, it is unanimously agreed upon that we should appreciate our
modern standards of medicine. Indeed, the wheel of progress is essentially synonymous
with continuously improving preventive medicine. But, recent breakthroughs have
accelerated innovation within the health industry, as the image for our health’s future starts
to take shape.

One of the most important advances in recent times has been the application of AI-based
techniques to healthcare. Artificial Intelligence is the use of coded software routines to
perform tasks usually associated with human cognitive functions, such as processing
language, recognizing sounds, and general pattern-learning for problem-solving functions.
The field has veritably sent shockwaves across the field, but don’t expect to start seeing an
Emergency Medical Hologram any time soon, researchers are doubtful we’ll soon see AI
doctors completely replace human physicians. However, the gains have already proved
substantial as powerful AI techniques can help unlock vital information hidden throughout the
huge swathes of data being exchanged across cyberspace and the medical sectors.

AI-based solutions fall into two broad categories.The first kind involves Machine Learning
techniques that analyse structured data, such as genetic, electrophysiological or imaging
data to cluster patients’ characteristics or determine the probability of disease risks and their
outcomes. In addition, it can help reduce diagnostic errors which are all too inevitable in
human clinical practice. The second category involves natural language processing
methods, which can extract key information from unstructured data such as medical
publications or clinical notes, in order to update the vast repertoire of medical literature and
knowledge a practitioner requires, at an unprecedented speed and efficiency. Though these
methods are not perfect at the get-go, as algorithms need to be reliably trained through past
clinical activity data before being immediately deployed for health applications.

Although research into AI for medicine has been substantial, it is most commonly allocated
around a handful of diseases: nervous system diseases, cardiovascular disease, and
cancer. Examples include the use of IBM Watson as a reliable AI system in the diagnosis of
cancer; the detection and analysis of the timings of spinal motor neuron discharges in order
to control prosthetics; or analysis of high-resolution MRI images in the diagnosis of
cardiovascular disease. That is not to imply that key developments are not to be found
elsewhere. A particular problem in health is the reliable prediction of stroke outcomes, a
concern exacerbated by the huge range of possible scenarios. One project found that
predictions made from physiological parameters 48 hours after the stroke were over twice as
accurate with the AI-based method than over the standard regression analysis model – an
increase from a 43% accuracy rate to 97.5%. AI-based research has been accelerated in
recent times thanks to the emergence of deep-learning models, which can be simply
understood as neural networks with a multitude of layers enabled through greater
computational power. One high profile case involved a deep-learning algorithm which
performed on par with 21 board-certified dermatologists when performing skin cancer
classification, after being trained through 130,000 clinical images of skin lesions. This
development has been particularly important in handling the ever-increasing quality and
quantity of data.

The continued development of AI-based methods has helped nurture other emergent fields.
One such example is the nascent field of Digital Epidemiology. The goal of epidemiology is,
at its core, to understand the health dynamics in populations and patterns of these diseases
in order to help understand their causes and subsequently consolidate preventive medicine
and promote health. Digital epidemiology, on the other hand, involves far more than merely
being epidemiology based on digital data, but more so concerns the collection of
epidemiological data outside the clinical sector, thus data not originally generated for
epidemiological purposes. One such example is Google Flu Trends, a webservice which
made flu predictions based on aggregate search query results. Alternatively, public social
media platforms such as Twitter are invaluable sources of data which can be used for
epidemiological purposes. The widespread adoption of mobile technologies including
phones, smartwatches and fitbit has been primary in the generation of such data. Due to the
sheer mass of information being exchanged through such channels, it is no surprise that
Machine Learning was vital to supporting the field. But one key concern relates to the
question of data access and privacy.

The deep learning approach is highly dependent on very large datasets from which the DL
algorithms can learn from. The issue is made more pronounced by the sensitive nature of
healthcare, thus requiring AI to be trained to high standards as it deals with human health.
Consequently, this has caused a large demand for open access to large amounts of data to
health professionals for the sake of public interest. Whilst AI has great promises for the
future of health, at the same time this collection, storage and use of vasts amounts of data
poses various ethical concerns regarding safety, privacy, ownerships and regulations,
especially in regards to what data was used for certain algorithms or the criteria through
which those algorithms were built on in the first place. Given the recency of the matter,
regulatory efforts are still in their infancy.

It was only by mid July 2018 that the World Health Organisation in joint with the International
Telecommunication Union would formally launch efforts into developing a benchmarking
process for health AI models. On June 15 this year, well within the recent outbreak, 11
entities including the EU, US, UK, Japan, France and Germany finally came together to
launch the Global Partnership on Artificial Intelligence. This initiative accompanies the
heightened and embroiled tensions between the tech spheres of various countries, such as
the increased pressures on “The Big 4” (Google, Amazon, Apple and Facebook), the
banning of Huawei devices or the war on TikTok. But more importantly, the recent pandemic
has highlighted various issues underpinning data privacy laws. The EU’s General Data
Protection Regulation has proved itself as a veritable barrier in the adoption of methods to
flatten the curve, notably the restrictive use of users’ GPS data. This is contrasted to the
liberties in, for example, South Korea which is sometimes critiqued for its intensified efforts in
using GPS, credit card history, CCTV footage and SMS data in tracking the developments of
COVID-19. Efforts to develop a pan-european Coronavirus App quickly fizzled once the
reality of differing attitudes to data and privacy dawned on the various member states. Now,
more than ever we are at a crossroad in the health industry. Whilst we cannot dismiss the
value of measures such as the GDPR, the undeniable value of AI-based methodology,
especially during such times, requires us to once again rethink how we approach data. It is
undeniable that AI will continue to increase its presence and use in our life, though the next
few steps will be crucial in determining Artificial Intelligence’s path.

Sources:

Emanuel, Ezekiel J., and Robert M. Wachter. “Artificial intelligence in health care: will the value match
the hype?.” Jama 321.23 (2019): 2281-2282.

Park, June. “Tracking COVID-19 in the Age of AI and Tech Wars.”, Asia Pacific Bulletin (2020).

Jiang, Fei, et al. “Artificial intelligence in healthcare: past, present and future.” Stroke and vascular
neurology 2.4 (2017): 230-243.

Salathé, Marcel. “Digital epidemiology: what is it, and where is it going?.” Life sciences, society and
policy 14.1 (2018): 1.

Wiegand, Thomas, et al. “WHO and ITU establish benchmarking process for artificial intelligence in
health.” The Lancet 394.10192 (2019): 9-11.

Zandi, Diana, et al. “New ethical challenges of digital technologies, machine learning and artificial
intelligence in public health: a call for papers.” Bulletin of the World Health Organization 97.1 (2019):
2-2.

nec Curabitur ut Lorem dolor. luctus ut